4 ms·

How is that relevant?

wdb 7y ago
Because of “ I personally know a person who has the symptoms, has been to Rome and has been denied a test because they were no registered citizen in the Netherlands (Stundent from another EU nation).” just notifying
- the-dude 7y ago
  That is not much clearer. Why do you think she is breaking which law?
  - TheOtherHobbes 7y ago
    The EU has freedom of movement, but you're required to register as a resident if you stay in any country for more than three months - although if you're studying you usually have a separate student visa. In most countries residency gives you access to the local healthcare system, although to access this you usually need to register separately with a doctor/health centre.
  - roel_v 7y ago
    She would be violating art 2.38 of the "Wet Basisregistratie Personen", roughly "act on the central registration of natural persons" by not registering.
- droithomme 7y ago
  FWIW, in the past I financially subsidized all of the costs of a clinic that served undocumented migrants (aka illegal aliens). They caught and treated countless cases of Tuberculosis and even Cholera, which stopped epidemics in the community. It's complete and totally psychotic madness, counterproductive, and will lead to the fall of society, to deny basic medical care particularly for epidemiological conditions to "illegal aliens". Societies that do so rightly fall. I'm totally willing to accept and concede this woman is an "illegal alien", has no right to be in the Netherlands, is a criminal, etc. Maybe she is maybe not but let's get the bullshit out of the way and say she is for the sake of argument. Should people like this be treated and tested for virulent plagues they reasonably might have or not? What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing so? The advantages of treating plague victims seem clear, let's tighten this up and you explain to me how citizens of the Netherlands benefit by denying simple and basic treatment of plague illnesses to people because of their status as an alleged criminal or not.
  - wdb 7y ago
    Definitely, she should be tested when the GP or RIVM thinks she meets all the symptoms/requirements for it. Never said she shouldn't! Apparently, they don't test you if you don't have at least 38 degrees temperature. Personally, I don't know the circumstances to make proper judgement. Only I commented on the statement the person wrote regarding being unregistered citizen.

wdb 7y ago

Because of “ I personally know a person who has the symptoms, has been to Rome and has been denied a test because they were no registered citizen in the Netherlands (Stundent from another EU nation).” just notifying

the-dude 7y ago
That is not much clearer. Why do you think she is breaking which law?
- TheOtherHobbes 7y ago
  The EU has freedom of movement, but you're required to register as a resident if you stay in any country for more than three months - although if you're studying you usually have a separate student visa. In most countries residency gives you access to the local healthcare system, although to access this you usually need to register separately with a doctor/health centre.
- roel_v 7y ago
  She would be violating art 2.38 of the "Wet Basisregistratie Personen", roughly "act on the central registration of natural persons" by not registering.
droithomme 7y ago
FWIW, in the past I financially subsidized all of the costs of a clinic that served undocumented migrants (aka illegal aliens). They caught and treated countless cases of Tuberculosis and even Cholera, which stopped epidemics in the community. It's complete and totally psychotic madness, counterproductive, and will lead to the fall of society, to deny basic medical care particularly for epidemiological conditions to "illegal aliens". Societies that do so rightly fall. I'm totally willing to accept and concede this woman is an "illegal alien", has no right to be in the Netherlands, is a criminal, etc. Maybe she is maybe not but let's get the bullshit out of the way and say she is for the sake of argument. Should people like this be treated and tested for virulent plagues they reasonably might have or not? What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing so? The advantages of treating plague victims seem clear, let's tighten this up and you explain to me how citizens of the Netherlands benefit by denying simple and basic treatment of plague illnesses to people because of their status as an alleged criminal or not.
- wdb 7y ago
  Definitely, she should be tested when the GP or RIVM thinks she meets all the symptoms/requirements for it. Never said she shouldn't! Apparently, they don't test you if you don't have at least 38 degrees temperature. Personally, I don't know the circumstances to make proper judgement. Only I commented on the statement the person wrote regarding being unregistered citizen.