5 ms·
Yea but you do realize that it’s a legislative issue? We need better controls for anti-competitive behavior. You can just flip the sides, if AMD controlled 85%
by spectramax 7y ago
Yea but you do realize that it’s a legislative issue? We need better controls for anti-competitive behavior.
You can just flip the sides, if AMD controlled 85% market share, the shareholders would demand the same unless we have laws preventing anti-competitive behavior.
That said, I do acknowledge the business leadership at Intel and their toxic attempts to prevent competition.
- yjftsjthsd-h 7y agoWhy would we legislate it when the underdog is winning? This is the market fixing itself without help.
- spectramax 7y agoYou're twisting my entire argument around. I did not say anything about the market fixing itself. Intel did a lot of things to prevent the market from fixing itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel#Litigation_and_regulatory_issues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel#Litigation_and_regulator... Legislation has nothing to do with "underdog" or marketshare. It has to do with anti-competitive practices regardless of the party. The same laws would apply to Intel or AMD regardless of their market share.