3 ms·
Correct: Uncompressed MessagePack is faster and smaller than uncompressed JSON, and compressed MessagePack is faster and smaller than compressed JSON. I still
by kentonv 7y ago
Correct: Uncompressed MessagePack is faster and smaller than uncompressed JSON, and compressed MessagePack is faster and smaller than compressed JSON.
I still don't see why you'd compare uncompressed MesasgePack to compressed JSON.
- nabla9 7y agoBecause I suspect that the MesasgePack–compressed or not–is not the worth of the effort until I see comparison. In other words, compressed MesasgePack is probably only tiny amount smaller than compressed JSON.
- kentonv 7y agoSure, a comparison between compressed JSON vs. compressed MessagePack is interesting. I interpreted your original message as requesting a comparison between compressed JSON vs. uncompressed MessagePack, which didn't make sense (but which I see people ask a lot, including elsewhere in this thread). Sorry if I misunderstood.
- nabla9 7y ago>I interpreted your original message as requesting a comparison between compressed JSON vs. uncompressed MessagePack You interpreted it correctly. And it makes sense. If MessagePack is alternative to JSON so in JSON.zstd if I need compactness.