So this person who not only provides their prior work history but also links to primary source material in multiple places through the whole list, AND includes

So this person who not only provides their prior work history but also links to primary source material in multiple places through the whole list, AND includes comments about where things are still unsure or developing, somehow _doesn't_ meet your criteria? I'd think that compared to the vast majority of material posted anywhere, this discussion is of much higher quality and veracity.