3 ms·
You are right the user experience is chunky and not self explanatory. But what you are trying to achieve is possible. Play with the settings a bit. I have it in
by sirmoveon 7y ago
You are right the user experience is chunky and not self explanatory. But what you are trying to achieve is possible. Play with the settings a bit. I have it in a way that if I type a domain that is assigned to a container, it will ask me first if I want to open it in its default container or a different one.
- Tomte 7y agoThat's not what he (and I and many others) are asking for. The site linked to is not assigned to any container. It opens in the old container, while it should open in the default container.
- sirmoveon 7y agoI'm just trying to help. The idea of having a link clicked inside a container and expect it to go to a different container as a default setting, seems to contradict web standars. Now, if you've explicitly assigned the clicked domain to a different container, then yes, it should go to its container (which is how it works, to me at least).
- StavrosK 7y ago> seems to contradict web standars But if I click a Google link, it already goes to a different container (the Google one), because I've told it to. > Now, if you've explicitly assigned the clicked domain to a different container, then yes, it should go to its container I am trying to assign "all non-google.com links" to open in the default container.
- Tomte 7y agoI'm simply explaining something you hadn't understood. But I'm not aware of any "web standard" codifying container behaviour.
- danlugo92 7y agoThere are (standarized) things that get sent to x.com when you click on a link to it on m.com. Stuff that wouldn't be there if you actually copy pasted the link.
- Tomte 7y agoReferer? Great. What does that have to do with containers, or better, why do you believe what many users want is forbidden by "web standards"?