What they are saying is that if they don't find evidence of Higgs in the next two years then scientists should re-evaluate the standard model theory of subatomi

What they are saying is that if they don't find evidence of Higgs in the next two years then scientists should re-evaluate the standard model theory of subatomic structure. I think that's very weird way to run science. It's like saying "if we can't find the cure for cancer in the next two years lets give up and assume there is no cure". It's not how science works.