4 ms·
Sure, that part I agree with. But the stuff around it, i.e. how those fundamentals are used and composed, also qualify as algorithmic to me. It’s probably a low
by jolux 7y ago
Sure, that part I agree with. But the stuff around it, i.e. how those fundamentals are used and composed, also qualify as algorithmic to me. It’s probably a lower-level definition than you’re using, because to me all programs are an algorithm of some kind.
- BubRoss 7y agoI don't know what you are trying to say at this point. You were arguing that every part of a program changes and expands. It should be pretty clear that that is not true.