3 ms·

I fail to see how planting evidence crosses a higher moral barrier than killing someone. By the way, in both cases, the person who makes the decision genuinely

by harikb 7y ago

I fail to see how planting evidence crosses a higher moral barrier than killing someone. By the way, in both cases, the person who makes the decision genuinely believes, probably on wrong information, that the person they are entrapping is evil and they just lack the right evidence So I don’t buy the argument that they would lose they sleep over what they did.

meowface 7y ago
Because there are different kinds of "evil". Killing an individual who they believe is responsible for the deaths of many people is different from framing a US citizen and going around the justice system by planting child pornography evidence, because they leaked secrets. These are not apples-to-apples situations.