So, this is basically all speculation based on the fact that no Techcrunch writer has applied for press credentials? How does this compare to other conferences?

So, this is basically all speculation based on the fact that no Techcrunch writer has applied for press credentials? How does this compare to other conferences? It seems to me that Arrington doesn't really give a damn after getting acquired, and Calacanis is fanning the flames to create controversy/get attention. The other explanation is that AOL acquired TechCrunch in part for the lucrative and growing conference business, and is putting pressure on its writers to play down the importance of a direct competitor. Again, no facts, just conjecture. I don't know enough about Arrington to pass judgment, but I'm instinctively wary of any piece that tries to frame any controversy as a black and white battle of good vs. evil.