3 ms·
I call it an overreaction precisely because I see no evidence of a really grave pandemic.
by cm2187 7y ago
I call it an overreaction precisely because I see no evidence of a really grave pandemic.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- pbourke 7y agoseems pretty grave to me: "From a well respected friend and intensivist/A&E consultant who is currently in northern Italy:" "Patients above 65 or younger with comorbidities are not even assessed by ITU, I am not saying not tubed, I’m saying not assessed and no ITU staff attends when they arrest. Staff are working as much as they can but they are starting to get sick and are emotionally overwhelmed." https://twitter.com/jasonvanschoor/status/1237144089855963136 https://twitter.com/jasonvanschoor/status/123714408985596313...
- rocha 7y agoIndividual risk is low, systemic risk is high. With the current the current numbers, the hospitalization rate is over 5% (critical cases). If the infection reaches 10% of the US population, it will require 1.5M hospital beds. Currently there are around 1M, at +60% occupancy.