2 ms·
> it took until firefox 3.6 to remove xbm support Why would it be a problem to remove if only a small number of little-known sites used it?
by qwerty456127 7y ago
> it took until firefox 3.6 to remove xbm support
Why would it be a problem to remove if only a small number of little-known sites used it?
- nitrogen 7y agoIf memory serves it used to be somewhat common in Unixy land before .png was added to browsers. There may have been long-lived documentation or academic pages with xbm that they were reluctant to break.
- qwerty456127 7y agoThen why remove it anyway? It doesn't seem hard to implement and maintain.