And it's not clear that such an exploit exists. Just because HenHouse happened to use the regex that way doesn't mean other places are, and that a similar explo

And it's not clear that such an exploit exists. Just because HenHouse happened to use the regex that way doesn't mean other places are, and that a similar exploit exists in the other products. I'm curious to know, but I'd think that the author would've tried to also exploit it in those other apps, and the fact that it's not documented here may be because they didn't find any issues with the other ones? It's a pretty generic regex that has many uses, and may be used for other stuff in other places.