3 ms·
>> As much as possible? >Why? Because PornHub is a platform. Why not limit uploading videos on YouTube, just because they can't moderate them all? > Good thin
by adontz 7y ago
>> As much as possible?
>Why?
Because PornHub is a platform. Why not limit uploading videos on YouTube, just because they can't moderate them all?
> Good thing PornHub's reported 2015 revenue was nearly half a billion. They can afford to operate ethically.
> They can afford to hire someone who can verify what a Hungarian driver's license looks like. They aren't poor.
First, define ethically in a worldwide accepted way.
Second, you are asking a business to take a loss just because you want them to. I don't think "ethically" is a strict legal term.
I believe there should be an unambiguous law taking into account interests of all parties. People get killed by cars, but cars are legal. We can't punish drivers only. And we can't punish content providers only.
> In this case it's know-your-content-provider.
I have posted on anonymity here.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22529650 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22529650
It's simply dangerous.
- ocdtrekkie 7y ago> Because PornHub is a platform. Why not limit uploading videos on YouTube Platforms aren't an inherent good. I absolutely think YouTube should be held accountable for it's behavior and the way it radicalizes people by recommending increasingly extreme videos. YouTube is a platform that is out of control, and another example of why unchecked immunity for platforms is a dystopian nightmare. > define ethically in a worldwide accepted way Not profiting from the distribution of child pornography. I think that's pretty universally understood to be required of ethical business. "Ethical" isn't a strict legal term, "distribution of child porn" is though.