3 ms·
Wow, 98 is a great score (higher than Google!) You're right, there's a lot of noise in the results. If the size reduction is small, like a few bytes, there's n
by marketer 16y ago
Wow, 98 is a great score (higher than Google!)
You're right, there's a lot of noise in the results. If the size reduction is small, like a few bytes, there's no need to show that.
- boyter 16y agoThere is always a fair amount of noise which I just tend to ignore. YSlow always penalises me for not using a CDN for example. Something useful to add would be links for the compressed images you use to work out how compressing the images could save space. A side by side comparison would be pretty useful so I could see how the compressing changes the look of the page. Just for fun I ran it over http://duckduckgo.com http://duckduckgo.com which comes back with 100. Google comes back with 98. Interesting.