4 ms·
I mean that they have not felt the need to take the extremely aggressive step of suspending their citizens' civil liberties for an arbitrary period of time, and
by leggomylibro 7y ago
I mean that they have not felt the need to take the extremely aggressive step of suspending their citizens' civil liberties for an arbitrary period of time, and rightly so.
Is this what you want in your community?
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/03/03/809965742/personal-essay-from-wuhan-living-in-hell https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/03/03/8099657...
- yongjik 7y ago> ... they have not felt the need to take the extremely aggressive step of suspending their citizens' civil liberties ... If that's your definition of "fine", then when you wrote this: > why are Germany and France fine despite having looser quarantine measures ... were you actually saying: "why are Germany and France having looser quarantine measures despite having looser quarantine measures?" /shakes head
- leggomylibro 7y agoI understand your point of view, but I would phrase it more like: "Why are Germany and France not worse off than Italy despite having looser quarantine measures and an earlier start to their outbreaks?" And I still haven't heard an answer which comes close to justifying Italy suspending its citizens' rights. But that's fine; it won't matter in a few months, and we're approaching an easy opportunity to make money and travel smart as the herds follow their predictable migrations. I just wish that people were less eager to give our fundamental rights away over this; history shows that they are unlikely to come back once they are surrendered. I'm already tired of the CBP shutting down entire 80mph interstates to search every vehicle passing through; where does this end? Anyways, arguing about it is just something to do while everything is shut down, eh? :)