> Authoritative expert opinions that require belief are worse and more dangerous than a random person's honest analysis Really? Believing multiple named doctor

> Authoritative expert opinions that require belief are worse and more dangerous than a random person's honest analysis Really? Believing multiple named doctors' opinions from a well-known journalistic source on a technical issue is more dangerous than believing a random stranger who I know nothing about other than their username? On the balance of risks, I'll take the doctors, thanks.