3 ms·

If you want an expert opinion, it's better not to watch WHO or the television. University lectures seem less opinionated, especially EPFL in Switzerland. The m

If you want an expert opinion, it's better not to watch WHO or the television. University lectures seem less opinionated, especially EPFL in Switzerland. The main message he has, that the oppportunity window for containing the virus closed in the last few weeks, and now it's all about mitigation, so that it doesn't overwhelm the health system. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RQBtA4dK9s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RQBtA4dK9s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0cjSnAynGs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0cjSnAynGs Sadly I saw some bias even in the Harvard talk when speaking about masks: saying that medical workers need them and that they don't work well against the virus anyways, so people shouldn't buy them is a contradictory statement. The truth is that it's a locally wise decision to buy N95 / N100 masks for partial protection, at the same time it's globally a bad decision for mitigating the virus, as health workers need them more.

hef19898 7y ago
Personally, I like the WHO stuff. Especially since it's more or less the primary source. They suck so hard on messaging so. They don't explain the way how there numbers are calculated, they don't educate on the assumptions and the methodology. They aren't using online channels to get their information out. I would have thought they learned these lessons during SARS, MERS, bird and swine flu, Ebola. Apparently not. And in that absence of hard facts all kind of theories strive. Usually entertained by amateurs in the particular field. The WHO should be out there, every day, every hour. With all experts on cable news, I think the slots would be there. And thanks for sharing these links!
- easytiger 7y ago
  The WHO predicted that 150 million people would be killed by avian flu [1]. Nothing happened. They predicted 750,000 people would die in the UK, it was more like 200. For swine flu it was minimum possible deaths of 11k but up to 70k. It was more like 400. They got upset when people wouldn't use their case fatality rates which turned out very wrong. Over half a million people died of flu related deaths last year. Don't recall reading a single news article about it 1, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/emergency-services-plan-for-750000-deaths-in-flu-pandemic-5350244.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/emergency... 2, https://jech.bmj.com/content/62/6/555.abstract https://jech.bmj.com/content/62/6/555.abstract

hef19898 7y ago

Personally, I like the WHO stuff. Especially since it's more or less the primary source. They suck so hard on messaging so. They don't explain the way how there numbers are calculated, they don't educate on the assumptions and the methodology. They aren't using online channels to get their information out. I would have thought they learned these lessons during SARS, MERS, bird and swine flu, Ebola. Apparently not. And in that absence of hard facts all kind of theories strive. Usually entertained by amateurs in the particular field. The WHO should be out there, every day, every hour. With all experts on cable news, I think the slots would be there. And thanks for sharing these links!

easytiger 7y ago
The WHO predicted that 150 million people would be killed by avian flu [1]. Nothing happened. They predicted 750,000 people would die in the UK, it was more like 200. For swine flu it was minimum possible deaths of 11k but up to 70k. It was more like 400. They got upset when people wouldn't use their case fatality rates which turned out very wrong. Over half a million people died of flu related deaths last year. Don't recall reading a single news article about it 1, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/emergency-services-plan-for-750000-deaths-in-flu-pandemic-5350244.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/emergency... 2, https://jech.bmj.com/content/62/6/555.abstract https://jech.bmj.com/content/62/6/555.abstract