4 ms·

A good REPL is nice, but its hardly a killer feature or a big productivity boost. If Clojure didn't have a REPL it would have been completely dead by now cause

• deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]
• yogthos 7y ago
  REPL driven workflow allows me to put the application in a specific state, and then continue developing features against that state. If you have to restart the application each time you make a code change then you have to rebuild that state each time. This creates a much slower feedback loop, especially when you're working on large applications. Furthermore, the REPL is a fantastic tool for troubleshooting live systems in production, and in some cases even patching them with zero downtime. I don't know a single person who's worked with this workflow on a serious project and would want to go back to compile/run cycle afterwards. Meanwhile, Clojure leverages host ecosystem getting all the same benefits as any other language running on it.
• wglb 7y ago
  >Programmers are equally productive[0] (or way more because of their big ecosystems) in languages that have a fast code-run cycle. I would disagree with this. I feel much more productive in Lisp than, e.g. go or C or C++. In Smalltalk, the productivity was so great that I was dead tired after 8 hours, as it was all thinking and effectively zero compiling.