I have seen that sentiment about the BLM owning too much pushed a lot more following the lengthy velvet glove treatment of the Bundies (anyone in suburban or ur

I have seen that sentiment about the BLM owning too much pushed a lot more following the lengthy velvet glove treatment of the Bundies (anyone in suburban or urban areas would have faced consequences well before millions of dollars in debts or years holding them and fleeing to a remote area would not help). How exactly is the BLM holding vast amounts of marginal land and renting it cheaply a harm? Why is a large wilderness reserve an overstep or threat?