3 ms·
In practice, nearly all your followers will be using fediverse software that understands and supports Move{Actor} in a similar way to Mastodon. There's not a ma
by vertex-four 7y ago
In practice, nearly all your followers will be using fediverse software that understands and supports Move{Actor} in a similar way to Mastodon. There's not a massive amount of fediverse software - it's not like IndieWeb where everyone does their own thing - and the microblogging-focused software largely implements the same feature set.
- kick 7y agoMost Mastodon instances currently running today don't support it.
- cptskippy 7y agoIt seems like virtual hosts would be reluctant to support it because it allows clients to move away from them. Vendor lock-in and such...
- kixiQu 7y agoMost people aren't getting paid for running their instances, and are doing it for the kind of goodwill that is only amplified by enabling features.
- grishka 7y agoI probably need to look into supporting this in my federated social network thing. It does work with Mastodon and Pleroma right now, but it certainly could do better.
- nenolod 7y agoThat depends on that software being deployed in a timely manner. There's plenty of instances out there still on Mastodon 1.6 and 2.0 because the admin installed it 2 years ago and hasn't updated since.