That's fair enough. But I was really just wanting to show, via irony, that the structure of the original argument is self-annihilating. That is, "X almost nev

That's fair enough. But I was really just wanting to show, via irony, that the structure of the original argument is self-annihilating. That is, "X almost never stays as just X therefore X is bad" applies to both branches reasonably, and is therefore invalid as an argument in support of one branch.