3 ms·
What’s the point? Instead of spending money on stocks and puts against the same stocks (which costs money), why not just allocate less to stocks in the first pl
by gfodor 7y ago
What’s the point? Instead of spending money on stocks and puts against the same stocks (which costs money), why not just allocate less to stocks in the first place?
The reasons I could imagine is if the stock is illiquid (401k, lockup, etc)
- markus_zhang 7y agoOP might not want to lose his positions I guess.
- tempsy 7y agoI’ve sold some stock earlier this month but not everything. I don’t want to sell some that I’ve been holding for a long time for tax reasons.
- bickfordb 7y agoTaxes on reallocating