2 ms·
would? what? if 5% needed ventilators, 70k of them would provide for 1.4 million infected. e.g. you could handle 0.4% of the population being sick concurrently
by michael-ax 7y ago
would? what? if 5% needed ventilators, 70k of them would provide for 1.4 million infected. e.g. you could handle 0.4% of the population being sick concurrently. as is, it is a catastrophe.