3 ms·
> The only people I've ever heard talk about the static html version are a few HNers. I'd wager 99% of people don't care, don't mind their email client's first
by movedx 7y ago
> The only people I've ever heard talk about the static html version are a few HNers. I'd wager 99% of people don't care, don't mind their email client's first load being slow (they just keep it open in a tab anyways), and don't even know about the static html version.
Are you claiming that because people are ignorant of an option that is clearly better for them, the option is redundant? So if people don't care about something, it's not better by definition of that fact?
- ymolodtsov 7y agoExactly zero everyday people switch to HTML-version. I’ve never seen anyone doing it in the wild. This sub-thread is just peak Hacker News.
- movedx 7y ago> I’ve never seen anyone doing it in the wild. You watch people as they use Gmail? You actively ask them? I guess if YOU haven't seen anyone do it, no one must be doing it.