3 ms·
The leap from static HTML to PHP misses a big chunk of dynamic web site growth that started to produce a lot of the bad patterns that lived on. As simple and n
by nkozyra 7y ago
The leap from static HTML to PHP misses a big chunk of dynamic web site growth that started to produce a lot of the bad patterns that lived on.
As simple and nice as static HTML is, it's inefficient. The reason we care about this now is mostly:
A) A lot of people just hate Javascript. And a lot of that hate is understandable.
B) People still worry about the crawlability of their SPAs
JS has a lot of problems but it's also fixing some of these by growing really fast (paradoxically, also one of its problems).
Bots will get more comprehensively better at rendering client-side only apps.