Interesting idea. For a bit I thought your comment was in response to another post I made recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22495175 https://news.y

Interesting idea. For a bit I thought your comment was in response to another post I made recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22495175 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22495175 My earlier comment was about webpages, not projects, though I think having a project-specific UUID would have major advantages as you point out. > Google specifically says that the page is missing cc8ece66-ded9-45f0-ad45-579bb97251bf, so I have no idea why it offers it. Looks like Google is matching only "ded9". I recall that Google treats dashes as word separators and underscores not as word separators. This might make a UUID not a good choice because you only want to display exact matches. https://searchengineland.com/google-bing-handle-underscores-dashes-differently-89672 https://searchengineland.com/google-bing-handle-underscores-...