5 ms·
Just because it is common doesn't mean it's not shady. And depending on what the "pseudo-activist role" entails, that could be a massive conflict of interest.
by throwsprtsdy 7y ago
Just because it is common doesn't mean it's not shady.
And depending on what the "pseudo-activist role" entails, that could be a massive conflict of interest. If a person at Company A is steering business toward Company B because they have an investment in Company B, that could easily conflict with their obligations toward Company A.
- rolltiide 7y agoThis > so I can't make a distinction for this particular practice. was meant to be a rebuttal to this > just because it is common doesn't mean it's not shady. so I think you walked right into it. > If a person at Company A is steering business toward Company B and that's company A's problem