3 ms·
If there was an iPhone available for every carrier and it cost $20, then nobody would be using Android except the hard-core Linux hackers (like myself). That m
by gloob 16y ago
If there was an iPhone available for every carrier and it cost $20, then nobody would be using Android except the hard-core Linux hackers (like myself).
That might well be true, but it ignores the reality of the facts that there isn't an iPhone available for every carrier for $20, and that Android devices are presently outselling it.
Cheap crap = sales, but you don't get to pretend that those sales don't count just because they involve cheap crap.
- ams6110 16y agoApple has never competed in the bargain basement.
- CountSessine 16y agoCheap crap = sales, but you don't get to pretend that those sales don't count just because they involve cheap crap. I wouldn't count them as much, though. A really large number of Android phones get sold to people who don't want to buy apps. Or maybe that doesn't matter if you're not a mobile developer. But was there some other relevance to the whole iOS vs Android spiel that was brought up in the parent comment? Because attracting developers is the only thing I can think of that would make OS marketshare matter at all.