You're right, you're not my personal tutor. Nor are you obliged to gain my approval. But when saying "you're wrong", a "why" is generally required to convince a

You're right, you're not my personal tutor. Nor are you obliged to gain my approval. But when saying "you're wrong", a "why" is generally required to convince anyone - not just myself, but also anyone else reading the thread. Yes, the Chicago school is biased. So is Econlog. But I was under the impression that their survey selection wasn't. If we're bringing up ideological biases though, the fact that your profile starts with "Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism" might be relevant to this discussion about economics... (And I would say that this is not an ad hominem attack, since it's directly relevant)