> The issue with Scrum is everything revolving around 2 week sprints. That doesn’t allow for much in terms of variability, longer term scheduling, or planning d

> The issue with Scrum is everything revolving around 2 week sprints. That doesn’t allow for much in terms of variability, longer term scheduling, or planning dependencies across multiple teams. That assertion is clearly false. Just because a Sprint is x weeks that does not mean that planning needs to focus exclusively on what you can do in x weeks. The x weeks is only relevant to establish a target for deliverables, but naturally those deliverables can and more often than not are indeed aligned with multi-sprint goals. Heck, even in the Agile buzzword universe there is the concept of epics and spikes. Agile does not mean the development process needs to be a 2 week circus where planners have the memory of a goldfish. It's a framework to get all stakeholders on the same page and establish operations to accommodate changes.