3 ms·
To be fair, writers have been doing this for a long time... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare%27s_style#Similarities_to_contemporaries http://en.wikiped
by asr 16y ago
To be fair, writers have been doing this for a long time...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare%27s_style#Similarities_to_contemporaries http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare%27s_style#Similarit...
Did you watch The Social Network? Did you like it? I think we all knew how it ended, it was the writing, cinematography, etc. that account for its popularity. And the fact that the writers stretched the truth so the story would be somewhat fresh :)
- apu 16y agoAnd the fact that the writers stretched the truth so the story would be somewhat fresh Actually I'd argue that they changed the story to make it less fresh, but more understandable/appealing to the non-tech audience. After all, who doesn't understand jilted love as a motivator? Whereas the "hacker's ethic" -- try something to see it it'll work -- is tougher to convey to a general audience. (For the record, I thought it was still a great movie.)
- robryan 16y agoEhh, I haven't seen more geeky hacker stuff references in a movie so while it was given broad appeal at leas they retained a decent amount of the hacker feel to it.
- InclinedPlane 16y agoIt's one thing to adapt a classic story or classic elements in a new form, that's how all writing works. It's another thing entirely to work within a narrow confine of sequels and reboots of a single story.