3 ms·

Just because it's attached to TextNow doesn't mean it's not attached anywhere. But yes, things like number-as-ID or email based identity is flawed and has been

Just because it's attached to TextNow doesn't mean it's not attached anywhere. But yes, things like number-as-ID or email based identity is flawed and has been manipulated and abused plenty of times. I'm not saying identity is a must or that it's either good or bad, I'm saying that that is what the market is like right now and removing it causes people to see it as a downgrade. Also, depending on your jurisdiction it might be illegal to provide a number that isn't yours (varying from spam laws to identity theft), just as it might violate the EULA and suspend service from whoever wanted that number in the first place. Generally, if you want to circumvent doxing yourself there are plenty of methods, but we're talking about mass-market here. The rest uses Jabber with OTR or some form of the signal protocol or maybe plain PGP/GPG crypto. But if we go down the rabbit hole of niches we would have a completely different context to work from.

grawprog 7y ago
>I'm saying that that is what the market is like right now and removing it causes people to see it as a downgrade. The market's only like that because there's a lack of alternatives. 'The market' isn't an abstract entity that came into existence out of nowhere. Companies make the choice to provide only that option, people never chose this. Removing the ability to chat with people using a username and password is the downgrade, that existed long before SMS and phone verification and tying those services to what is essentially an epehemeral number not ever actually owned by you, but the company that provides it. There's plenty of places in the world where having a consistent phone number isn't really the norm. I've got friends i've saved multiple phone numbers for because they signed up to this or that messenger with different phone numbers. Phone numbers are useless as an identification method. I pointed this out in another comment, but because whatsapp and signal use this system, there are random people in my contacts list, whose profile pictures and status updates I can see, but I have no idea who they are because the people that used to have those phone numbers no longer have them and they were reassigned to someone else.

grawprog 7y ago

>I'm saying that that is what the market is like right now and removing it causes people to see it as a downgrade. The market's only like that because there's a lack of alternatives. 'The market' isn't an abstract entity that came into existence out of nowhere. Companies make the choice to provide only that option, people never chose this. Removing the ability to chat with people using a username and password is the downgrade, that existed long before SMS and phone verification and tying those services to what is essentially an epehemeral number not ever actually owned by you, but the company that provides it. There's plenty of places in the world where having a consistent phone number isn't really the norm. I've got friends i've saved multiple phone numbers for because they signed up to this or that messenger with different phone numbers. Phone numbers are useless as an identification method. I pointed this out in another comment, but because whatsapp and signal use this system, there are random people in my contacts list, whose profile pictures and status updates I can see, but I have no idea who they are because the people that used to have those phone numbers no longer have them and they were reassigned to someone else.