It's ironic that in the end the narrowness of the warrant was what hurt him. They could see he went past the house during the time of the burglary but not that

It's ironic that in the end the narrowness of the warrant was what hurt him. They could see he went past the house during the time of the burglary but not that he went past there regularly. By showing them more data he convinced them he was innocent. Not that I am arguing for more pervasive powers for data collection. But rather, appreciating how poweful data is and how dangerous data without context is. People need control over and access to data about them guaranteed.