4 ms·
Author here -- I can add DO to the comparison today, I'll ping here once I have done so! --- EDIT: Done! I have updated the notebook with the digital Ocean o
by spalas 7y ago
Author here -- I can add DO to the comparison today, I'll ping here once I have done so!
---
EDIT: Done!
I have updated the notebook with the digital Ocean offering using their General Purpose (dedicated CPU) droplets.
The major takeaways for DO are that they:
- Also do not charge for the control plane resources
- $/vCPU is less expensive than the other providers
- $/GB memory is more expensive than the other providers
- No preemptible or committed use discounts available
For smaller clusters and/or clusters running CPU bound workloads, DO looks like the most affordable option!
- patrickaljord 7y agoHow about https://www.packet.com/solutions/kubernetes/ https://www.packet.com/solutions/kubernetes/ ?
- spalas 7y agoHmm... It looks like for smaller machine types the packet bare metal machines are quite a bit more expensive than the equivalent cloud provider VMs, but as you move to larger machine types Packet's pricing doesn't continue to grow linearly (making them more competitive). Also, I would need to do some further research to understand how to fairly compare the physical CPU cores on the bare metal systems w/ the vCPUs offered across the major cloud VMs.