4 ms·
It could just be the further ease of implementation, and spread of information about, good typography implementation. When the Ruby-esque templates were first t
by th0ma5 16y ago
It could just be the further ease of implementation, and spread of information about, good typography implementation. When the Ruby-esque templates were first taking hold, I would've argued that fonts were getting bigger, or at least the headlines, but downloadable type on the web also offers different weights, which I think is perhaps the biggest change. Weights make a lot of sense in print, but I wonder if one the web we were somewhat better off, readability wise, with at least consistent weighting.