4 ms·
It's just not a great article. Farnam Street is popping up on HN all the time these days. They had one article a while back which I liked enough to add their RS
by apatters 7y ago
It's just not a great article. Farnam Street is popping up on HN all the time these days. They had one article a while back which I liked enough to add their RSS feed to my reader (can't remember which one), but to be frank, I think everything I've read from that site since then has disappointed, and I've since removed them.
Seriously, there is no value to internalizing a rule like "think the same way that the theory of general relativity would." It doesn't even make sense. This is low grade pop psych.
When passions are running high, the first thing you should do before making decisions is cool down. You don't need a novel mental model you just need to take a break and wait for everyone's emotions (and the accompanying stress hormones, which suppress rational thinking) to subside. That's a better mental model than anything in this article.
- forkexec 7y agoI seems like a clickbait title with vapid, filler content using HN as an advertising platform. If it sinks to the depths of terrible, flagging it at the top is a possible response.
- kungtotte 7y agoIt has some interesting posts, but most/all of them are older ones. These two come to mind: https://fs.blog/2015/11/map-and-territory https://fs.blog/2015/11/map-and-territory https://fs.blog/2019/03/active-mindset/ https://fs.blog/2019/03/active-mindset/ It's not a wellspring of original thought, but more about shining a light on things we take for granted.