3 ms·

The snark was perhaps a touch excessive, but this is indeed an excellent reason why the radical suggestion proffered shall remain radical. (isn't this basicall

• im3w1l 7y ago
  It's very easy to misinterpret what a theorem means. And doing this can derail a conversation for decades. I remember two such cases. The theorem that two hidden layer neural networks can approximate any function - Common interpretation: two layers are enough. And a proof of well I don't recall the details... being interpreted as imaging being limited by wavelength. Then came super resolution which worked around it by not using some of the implicit assumptions of the common interpretation. So I think it's justified to take issue.