3 ms·
> "Not having guns at worst would force a group of people to find a new and less dangerous hobby" No, not having guns at worst would deprive minorities of the
by tonyztan 7y ago
> "Not having guns at worst would force a group of people to find a new and less dangerous hobby"
No, not having guns at worst would deprive minorities of the ability to protect themselves. It is not only a hobby; it is also an effective means of self-defense.
- nemothekid 7y ago>No, not having guns at worst would deprive minorities of the ability to protect themselves. Are we talking about America? Where those same minorities are shot for holding toy guns?
- tonyztan 7y agoWell, I know many minorities who carry guns to protect themselves. Both racial minorities and sexual minorities (LGBT+). Racism and police violence are real problems that need to be addressed, but taking away guns is not the solution.