> ...they'd build a sorta-reliable S3... From operational experience reports of S3 I've seen out there and discussions [1], including on HN [2], once you reach

> ...they'd build a sorta-reliable S3... From operational experience reports of S3 I've seen out there and discussions [1], including on HN [2], once you reach a large enough object count, S3 is "sorta-reliable". Objects will disappear. The durability claim is not SLA-enforced [3], which is uptime-oriented. The only remedy is a service credit. [1] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/07/19/data_durability_statements/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/07/19/data_durability_sta... [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14880617 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14880617 [3] https://aws.amazon.com/s3/sla/ https://aws.amazon.com/s3/sla/