3 ms·
On a related topic, I've had a ton of problems finding a cloud storage system that will reliably handle files around 100-200gb. Does anyone have a recommendatio
by standardUser 7y ago
On a related topic, I've had a ton of problems finding a cloud storage system that will reliably handle files around 100-200gb. Does anyone have a recommendation for a service that can handle that file size with ease?
- brian_herman__ 7y agoHave you tried amazon s3? What is your use case? Can you elaborate? edit:Grammar
- toomuchtodo 7y agoAny object storage system (S3, Backblaze B2, Azure Blob, GCP) should be able to handle those file sizes with proper chunking into smaller parts (limit details below per object store). S3: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/mpuoverview.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/mpuoverview.... (Max object size: 5TB, Max single multipart size: 5GB) Backblaze B2: https://www.backblaze.com/b2/docs/large_files.html https://www.backblaze.com/b2/docs/large_files.html (Max file size: 10TB, Max single object size: 5GB) Azure: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/understanding-block-blobs--append-blobs--and-page-blobs https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/un... (Max file size: 4.75 TB, Max single block size: 100MB) Google: https://cloud.google.com/storage/quotas https://cloud.google.com/storage/quotas (Max file size: 5TB, doesn't appear there is a lower limit for objects to be composed into a single object, docs could be better in this regard) @khc: Terminology updated to be more clear for S3
- reaperducer 7y agoI'd drop Microsoft from that list because the request for for something "reliable." It's reliable enough, if you can get it to Microsoft's cloud. But for the last six months I've struggled putting very large files into Azure, using five different connections from five different providers in three locations. Small files are no problem. But large ones take two, three, or four tries.
- toomuchtodo 7y agoI don't disagree Azure is hot garbage, just listing for completeness. S3 and Backblaze B2 are my go-to object stores.
- khc 7y agoS3 max single object size is 5TB. The 5GB limit is for single part upload API. You can use the multi-part API to upload single object in multiple parts.
- BrandonY 7y agoHi, GCS engineer here. The lower limit on composing objects is one source object, in which case you are not so much composing as you are copying with style. Zero source objects is an error. I will file a note about the docs, thanks.
- toomuchtodo 7y agoThank you so much! Is there a limit on size of objects besides the 5TB max described in the docs, similar to other object stores where multiparts have lower limits than the total composed object?
- BrandonY 7y agoThere is also a lower bound of 0 bytes :) You can compose a 4TB object with a 1 byte object, or you can compose 32 150GB objects, just so long as the destination object doesn't go over 5 terabytes.
- toomuchtodo 7y agoBrilliant! Thank you again!
- Taek 7y agoSia, the system described above, comfortably handles files of 100-200 gb, and with the recent Skynet link also enables filesharing for files up to 400 GB.
- rsync 7y ago"On a related topic, I've had a ton of problems finding a cloud storage system that will reliably handle files around 100-200gb. Does anyone have a recommendation for a service that can handle that file size with ease?" rsync.net gives you an empty, ZFS filesystem that you can do anything you like with.[1] I believe the file-size limit is 16 exbibytes (264 bytes). rsync.net can also talk to every cloud storage provider[2] because rclone[3] is built into the platform: ssh user@rsync.net rclone s3:/some/bucket rsync/home/dir [1] http://rsync.net http://rsync.net [2] https://www.rsync.net/products/universal.html https://www.rsync.net/products/universal.html [3] https://rclone.org/ https://rclone.org/
- mkl 7y agoLooks like HN ate the * characters in 2**64 16 exbibytes is 2^64 bytes.