3 ms·

The discussion linked to in the arstechnia.com article is fascinating. The paper's author has blinders on. https://pubpeer.com/publications/3418816F1BA55AFB7A2E

• perl4ever 7y ago
  If this is about the sun moving because of not being centered, that doesn't make any sense at all to me. Most of the wobble would be Jupiter, so shouldn't Jupiter's orbit be the approximate period of the wobble? Which is 11 years, which is obviously way too short to be in a discussion about global warming. I found a picture on Wikipedia that seems to confirm that the barycenter takes about a decade to go from near the center of the sun to roughly the furthest away that it gets. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Solar_system_barycenter.svg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Solar_sy...
  • loki49152 7y ago
    11 - 15 years is exactly the period of the "standard business cycle", which was established by the boom/bust nature of economies that depended primarily on agriculture. Farmers considered it common knowledge that the "business cycle" depended on the Sun's variability. So, there is a definite, well-known, historically traced effect that occurs on around that time scale. It would take serious study to move past the coincidence level, but it's not something that can be dismissed out of hand, either.
    • perl4ever 7y ago
      Uh, it's also the length of the sunspot cycle.