> You seem to be using trusted computing to refer only to hardware that works against the owner. Instead, I've always thought of it as referring to a device tha

> You seem to be using trusted computing to refer only to hardware that works against the owner. Instead, I've always thought of it as referring to a device that is capable of providing various guarantees about the code it executes - it just happens that current implementations are primarily designed to provide those guarantees to third parties instead of the owner. This is also my take on it. As with many issues in tech, it’s not about the tech itself, but rather who the tech is working for.