3 ms·
Generating bizzare banking activity is one of the risks, but, again, only where what you're doing is illegal. Also, you don't have to trade in attention attract
by dmos62 7y ago
Generating bizzare banking activity is one of the risks, but, again, only where what you're doing is illegal. Also, you don't have to trade in attention attracting sums.
You don't have to trust the person you're trading with, because the platform uses an escrow system (multi-signature BTC addresses), account age signing (an old account is unlikely to have been stolen) and has mediation. That leaves negligible risk, of which you're aware.
> delegating trust from a central authority to a disparate set of individuals. I'm not convinced that's a good thing
Bisq provides very similar decentralization and privacy guarantees as Bitcoin (which is the point, because a system is as decentralized/private as its weakest link), so I'll delegate answering this to the myriad of articles about Bitcoin's trustworthiness.
- Nursie 7y ago> the platform uses an escrow system (multi-signature BTC addresses), But still acknowledges that some methods can result in the money being recalled after the BTC has been released. > account age signing (an old account is unlikely to have been stolen) Unlikely, but you still have to trust that the account hasn't simply been used to build up trust before the big score, which is something we see over and over and over again in the cryptocurrency space. > Bisq provides very similar decentralization and privacy guarantees as Bitcoin Which is absolutely not the same thing I pointed out to you as the problem. You can't just say "but bitcoin!" to wave away that this platform still involves trust, and not trust in a regulated actor like a bank, but trust in a number of actors, any of whom may not be trustworthy. You may not have to trust the platform itself, but it's not clear to me that that is any sort of positive.