3 ms·
This might be an argument for open standards being better for consumers. I don't want to say that vendors shouldn't implement custom protocols for an enhanced
by mumblemumble 7y ago
This might be an argument for open standards being better for consumers.
I don't want to say that vendors shouldn't implement custom protocols for an enhanced experience. But, as a consumer, I'd be a lot more likely to shell out for a product like this if I knew that there were a wifi speaker equivalent of PostScript, and that the speaker supported it. That gives me confidence that there will be some least-common-denominator level of functionality that I'll be able to get out of it for as long as the hardware itself lasts.
As it stands, my impression is that these limited-lifespan IoT products are mostly for people whose disposable income is rather more disposable than mine is.
- tracker1 7y agoProbably the closest to what you are looking for would be a bluetooth audio interface... then using your phone or other device to do the actual playback. Chromecast devices aren't too far off themselves, I wish Google was more open with them though, per another comment learned they don't even make the audio version anymore.