3 ms·
> If we’re paying most of a trillion dollars each year for defense, why not defend us at least a little bit against stuff that might well happen sooner or later
by zeveb 7y ago
> If we’re paying most of a trillion dollars each year for defense, why not defend us at least a little bit against stuff that might well happen sooner or later: giant fires, flooding, pandemics, big/long power outages, fuel shortages, water or food shortages, ice storms, et c?
The best answer is that the federal constitution gives the Congress the authority to fund a navy and an army, but is silent on the matter of 'giant fires, flooding, pandemics, big/long power outages, fuel shortages, water or food shortages, ice storms &c.' — and due to the Tenth Amendment, that means that the states are individually responsible for that.
I think that it'd make sense to pass an amendment to give the federal government some power in this area.
- isaacgreyed 7y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessary_and_Proper_Clause https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessary_and_Proper_Clause
- zeveb 7y agoThat merely states 'The Congress shall have Power … To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.' Congress has the power to pass laws which are necessary and proper to carrying out the powers the states granted it in the Constitution. That doesn't mean that it has the power to pass any laws whatsoever, and even if it did the Tenth Amendment would supersede it. The Constitution simply doesn't grant the United States general power to deal with natural disasters, so there is nothing necessary and proper for the federal government to do.
- sneak 7y ago...and yet we have the Deparment of Education, FEMA, and the Department of Health/CDC.