5 ms·
Or maybe they factored in 8 years worth of service?
by sambe 7y ago
Or maybe they factored in 8 years worth of service?
- oarsinsync 7y agoThey market their bulbs as having a 15 year life span.
- thisisauserid 7y agoThe bridge will still work from your private network and one can still control the lights with the app. All that's being disabled is the external control.
- Sanzig 7y ago...which all the digital assistants like Google Home or Alexa use, so this breaks voice commands for those. For most people, that's the main reason to have smart lights.
- fullstop 7y agoThe V1 bridge does not require any outside access from an Echo device -- it communicates directly with the bridge over the local network. With V2 it requires a skill, a Hue account, and access from the internet to the bridge.
- tzs 7y agoAre you sure it requires access from the internet to the bridge for V2? I think it may only require that the bridge can access the internet. I have a V2 with "Out of home control" set to disabled and it works fine with my Echo Dot and with the Amazon Alexa apps on my phone and iPad. My guess is that the bridge sends status information, including the bridge's IP address, to the Hue site, and the Echo can retrieve that information in order to find the IP address to send commands to.
- fullstop 7y agoYou're probably right. I was trying to say that the v2 bridge requires some sort of cloud service to function with an echo when the v1 did not.
- hokumguru 7y agoFWIW if you use HomeKit with a hub then it’s Apple’s servers not Phillips’ that do the external traffic.
- Marsymars 7y agoThat's specifically if you're using HomeKit remotely - if you're using HomeKit locally it works without internet connectivity, unlike Alexa/Google Home.
- jpindar 7y agoAll that's being disabled is external control through Phillips' servers. If you're willing to set up port forwarding (and DDNS if needed) there are apps that allow you to enter both internal and external addresses, so you can still have external control.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- ihuman 7y agoThe bulbs are compatible with the newer bridges. While misleading, that isn't false.
- filoleg 7y agoBulbs (the expensive part) will still function, just gotta upgrade the $25 bridge. And even without upgrading the bridge, bulbs will still work just fine with the older one, as long as you are trying to access them on your LAN instead of while you are outside of home. What Philips did here sounds very reasonable to me imo.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]