Even if you did engage in acts of parallel construction, why would you risk exposing your methods for executing it on bypassing an irrelevant ToS? As quoted, yo

Even if you did engage in acts of parallel construction, why would you risk exposing your methods for executing it on bypassing an irrelevant ToS? As quoted, you can still use the service for everything until the point of actually generating the evidence to be presented in court. Just use it to provide useful information to guide your actual evidence collection. The restriction on mentioning it in court is similarly silly, this is basically just a longwinded "We totally tried to stop abuse of our service" sticker.