3 ms·
That's a great stack. Any reason you went with Redis for the caching instead of memcached?
by rapind 16y ago
That's a great stack. Any reason you went with Redis for the caching instead of memcached?
- thibaut_barrere 16y agoWell I'm more used to Redis, as I've used more than a couple of times with Resque (job processing in Ruby). I started the crawler behind HackerBooks with Resque and Redis, but ended up saving some RAM by going back to a simple daemon. I reused Redis to provide the caching. So well: I mostly used what I was used too.
- rapind 16y agoDefinitely makes sense if you're already using Redis for something else.