> Wouldn't that be offset by the falling birth rate in the US? So because the birth rate is lower in aggregate, people with three kids don't exist? Or that the

> Wouldn't that be offset by the falling birth rate in the US? So because the birth rate is lower in aggregate, people with three kids don't exist? Or that they should need less space somehow? I don't understand the relevance to either the post you replied to or even the article itself. Seems like you're responding to a point nobody made, including yourself. > They're cheaper than anywhere else in the world, and people feel safer in them. They're reasons, but not especially good ones. Why did you even reply to a post when you're ignoring what it said? If you want to grandstanding about this topic, by all means reply to the thread as a whole. That's what top level replies are for. Why reply to a specific post if you have no interest in discussing that post's content or ideas? Nothing you replied to even came close to being relevant, I'm not even sure you read the post you replied to.