4 ms·
If you are 18-25, there is a HORRIBLE principal-agent problem here. Total misalignment of interests. Owing to the fact that, on average, young people will have
by _marlowe_ 7y ago
If you are 18-25, there is a HORRIBLE principal-agent problem here. Total misalignment of interests.
Owing to the fact that, on average, young people will have more years of exposure to a set of policies, they should have voting power to shape them. One person, one vote leads to this misalignment.
Democracy with an inter-generational focus should allocate votes based on duration of policy exposure. I.e. max(1, (Avg US Life Expectancy - age)) votes.
- jbob2000 7y agoYou used to be able to count on your parents to have your best interests in mind. There seems to be a big generation gap between the pre and post internet generations, which is where I think some of this political turmoil is coming from.
- downerending 7y agoParent here: You still can--it's my highest priority. That said, I'm more concerned about what you'd really want in the long term than what you think you want right now.
- AnimalMuppet 7y agoI admit the principle-agent problem. But let's give those with the least experience and knowledge the most voting power? That seems like a very unwise solution.
- _marlowe_ 7y agoThen raise the voting age to 25 or something. It's just an illustration.